Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 25, 2016BMC Health Services ResearchOpen Access

A qualitative study of professional and carer perceptions of the threats to safe hospital discharge for stroke and hip fracture patients in the English National Health Service

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Population

213 stakeholders involved in discharge planning and care transition for stroke and hip fracture patients…

Design

Other

Authors

JWJustin WaringSBSimon BishopFMFiona Marshall

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Stakeholder views link patient harms to systemic discharge factors; leaves open targeted interventions across care boundaries.

Structured PICO

P
Population
213 stakeholders (healthcare professionals, patients, and carers) involved in discharge planning and care transition for stroke and hip fracture patients across two regional health and social care systems in the English National Health Service.

The study highlights the complex relationship between patient harms and systemic factors during hospital discharge, emphasizing the need for better communication and collaboration across care boundaries.

Cite This Study

Waring et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70ab15febe604dd7097038https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1568-2
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Understanding the occupational and organizational boundaries to safe hospital discharge2014 · 75 citations
  2. 2Why study narrative?1999 · 765 citations
  3. 3Older patients and delayed discharge from hospital2000 · 114 citations
  4. 4Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: A review of key issues for hospitalists2007 · 832 citations
  5. 5The Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events Affecting Patients after Discharge from the Hospital2003 · 1,923 citations