Why the study?
The relative accuracies of the six Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Doppler velocity cut points for classifying NASCET ICA stenosis had not been compared.
Does the SRU Carotid Doppler Velocity Criteria accurately grade internal carotid artery stenosis compared to NASCET arteriography?
Does the SRU Carotid Doppler Velocity Criteria accurately grade internal carotid artery stenosis compared to NASCET arteriography?
The SRU consensus Doppler cut points vary in accuracy, with PSV cut points showing high sensitivity/low specificity for 50% stenosis and high specificity/moderate sensitivity for 70% stenosis.
SRU cut points show variable accuracy with sensitivity-specificity tradeoffs; leaves open optimal thresholds pending prospective validation.
PURPOSE: The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) consensus panel proposed six Doppler velocity cut points for classifying internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis of 50% and 70% according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) method. Their relative accuracies have not been compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Meta-analysis performed following comprehensive literature review and identification of manuscripts with graphs of individual patient NASCET ICA stenosis measured by arteriography versus ICA peak-systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV) and ICA PSV to common carotid artery (CCA) PSV. True positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives were calculated and used in two-level mixed effects models. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. Areas under the ROC curves were estimated. RESULTS: Nine studies performed between 1993 and 2016 were identified after review of 337 manuscripts. There were 1738 bifurcation data points extracted for PSV, 1026 for EDV, and 775 for ICA/CCA ratio. The highest sensitivity was 96% (95% CI: 93%, 98%) for PSV of 125 cm/s (50% stenosis) and highest specificity 86% (95% CI: 71%, 93%) for PSV of 230 cm/s (70% stenosis). Areas under the ROC curves ranged from a high of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.95) for PSV (50% stenosis) to a low of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.88) for EDV (70% stenosis). CONCLUSIONS: The SRU consensus Doppler cut points vary in their accuracies for predicting ICA stenosis. The PSV cut points have tradeoffs: high sensitivity/low specificity for 50% stenosis and high specificity/moderate sensitivity for 70% stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polak et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: