Why the study?
Does operative intervention improve growth history in children with congenital heart defects?
Does operative intervention improve growth history in children with congenital heart defects?
Operative intervention for congenital heart defects does not result in a marked shift in growth patterns, though children tend to approach normative growth as they reach adolescence.
No marked growth shift after surgery for congenital heart defects; leaves open whether earlier or combined interventions improve outcomes.
This investigation of the growth history of children with operable congenital cardiac defects has used standard anthropometric techniques involving 5 measures, 5 ratios, skeletal age assessments, and photographs. Reported here are the longitudinal observations on the first 274 children examined over various periods before and after surgery. Both the preoperative and samples differ from the norm in that measurements are somewhat smaller and skeletal maturation is somewhat delayed. As the children approach adolescence, they tend to approach closer to the norm. No marked shift in pattern after surgery has thus far been demonstrated, although where differences exist, they are in the direction of larger measures in the postsurgical group of children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robinson et al. (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: