Why the study?
Does high-frequency electrical stimulation depolarize cardiac cells and reduce artifacts compared to single biphasic pulses in cardiomyocyte cultures?
Does high-frequency electrical stimulation depolarize cardiac cells and reduce artifacts compared to single biphasic pulses in cardiomyocyte cultures?
High-frequency electrical stimulation of cardiomyocytes reduces electrode voltages and allows for effective artifact reduction, enabling the detection of action potentials during stimulation.
May enable artifact-free AP recording in cardiomyocyte cultures; hypothesis-generating for stimulation protocols, requiring in vivo validation before any clinical consideration.
A novel modality for the electrical stimulation of cardiac cells is described. The technique is based on HF stimulation-burst of HF (1-25 kHz) biphasic square waves-to depolarize the cells and trigger action potentials (APs). HF stimulation was demonstrated in HL-1 cardiomyocyte cultures using microelectrode arrays, and the underlying mechanisms were investigated using single-cell model simulations. Current thresholds for HF stimulation increased at higher frequencies or shorter burst durations, and were typically higher than thresholds for single biphasic pulses. Nonetheless, owing to the decreasing impedance of metal electrodes with increasing frequencies, HF bursts resulted in reduced electrode voltages (up to four fold). Such lowered potentials might be beneficial in reducing the probability of irreversible electrochemical reactions and tissue damage, especially for long-term stimulation. More significantly, stimulation at frequencies higher than the upper limit of the AP power spectrum allows effective artifact reduction by low-pass filtering. Shaping of the burst envelope provides further reduction of the remaining artifact. This ability to decouple extracellular stimulation and recording in the frequency domain allowed detection of APs during stimulation-something previously not achievable to the best of our knowledge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dura et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: