Why the study?
What are the current diagnostic algorithms and imaging modalities for clinically suspected acute deep vein thrombosis?
What are the current diagnostic algorithms and imaging modalities for clinically suspected acute deep vein thrombosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review summarizes current diagnostic algorithms for DVT, highlighting the established role of clinical decision rules, D-dimer, and ultrasound, while noting ongoing challenges in specific DVT subtypes.
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common disease that may lead to potentially fatal complications, such as pulmonary embolism. In the past decades several diagnostic tools and algorithms for DVT have been studied. Currently the combination of a clinical decision rule, D-dimer testing and compression ultrasonography has proved to be safe and effective for the diagnosis of DVT in the lower extremities. Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can be useful as additional or secondary imaging modalities. This review will discuss the elements currently used in making the clinical diagnosis of DVT. These elements include clinical decision rules and D-dimer testing, different imaging investigations and the appropriate use of these within diagnostic algorithms in patients with clinically suspected DVT. Although current knowledge of the options available to diagnose DVT of the lower extremities is well established, there are still unresolved issues, including the optimal diagnosis of recurrent DVT and distal DVT. Furthermore, the diagnosis of DVT of the upper extremities will be discussed, including the different imaging modalities and the limitations of these techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: