No AccessJournal of Urology1 Jun 1987Hypertension Following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy James E. Lingeman, and Thomas B. Kulb James E. LingemanJames E. Lingeman More articles by this author , and Thomas B. KulbThomas B. Kulb More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)75304-9AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Hypertension Following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy." The Journal of Urology, 137(6), p. 142A © 1987 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByEassa W, Sheir K, Gad H, Dawaba M, El-Kenawy M and Elkappany H (2018) Prospective Study of the Long-Term Effects of Shock Wave Lithotripsy on Renal Function and Blood PressureJournal of Urology, VOL. 179, NO. 3, (964-969), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2008.El-Assmy A, El-Nahas A, Hekal I, Badran M, Youssef R and Sheir K (2018) Long-Term Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy on Renal Function: Our Experience With 156 Patients With Solitary KidneyJournal of Urology, VOL. 179, NO. 6, (2229-2232), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2008.Krambeck A, Gettman M, Rohlinger A, Lohse C, Patterson D and Segura J (2018) Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension Associated With Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal and Proximal Ureteral Stones at 19 Years of FollowupJournal of Urology, VOL. 175, NO. 5, (1742-1747), Online publication date: 1-May-2006.JEWETT M, BOMBARDIER C, LOGAN A, PSIHRAMIS K, WESLEY-JAMES T, MAHONEY J, LUYMES J, IBANEZ D, RYAN M and HONEY J (2018) A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL TO ASSESS THE INCIDENCE OF NEW ONSET HYPERTENSION IN PATIENTS AFTER SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR ASYMPTOMATIC RENAL CALCULIJournal of Urology, VOL. 160, NO. 4, (1241-1243), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1998.Lingeman J, Woods J and Nelson D (2018) Commentary on ESWL and Blood PressureJournal of Urology, VOL. 154, NO. 1, (2-4), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1995.Weber C, Gluck U, Staehler G and Rettig R (2018) Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment Raises Blood Pressure in Borderline Hypertensive RatsJournal of Urology, VOL. 154, NO. 1, (232-236), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1995.Recker F, Hofmann W, Bex A and Tscholl R (2018) Quantitative Determination of Urinary Marker Proteins: A Model to Detect Intrarenal Bioeffects after Extracorporeal LithotripsyJournal of Urology, VOL. 148, NO. 3 Part 2, (1000-1006), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1992.Koide T, Yoshioka T, Yamaguchi S, Utsunomiya M and Sonoda T (2018) A Strategy of Cystine Stone ManagementJournal of Urology, VOL. 147, NO. 1, (112-114), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1992.Weber C, Moran M, Braun E and Drach G (2018) Injury of Rat Renal Vessels Following Extracorporeal Shock Wave TreatmentJournal of Urology, VOL. 147, NO. 2, (476-481), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1992.Yokoyama M, Shoji F, Yanagizawa R, Kanemura M, Kitahara K, Takahasi S, Kawai K, Oda H, Osaka M and Handa H (2018) Blood Pressure Changes Following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for UrolithiasisJournal of Urology, VOL. 147, NO. 3 Part 1, (553-557), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1992.Ryan P, Jones B, Kay E, Nowlan P, Kiely E, Gaffney E and Butler M (2018) Acute and Chronic Bioeffects of Single and Multiple Doses of Piezoelectric Shockwaves (EDAP LT.01)Journal of Urology, VOL. 145, NO. 2, (399-404), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1991.Morris J, Husmann D, Wilson W, Denstedt J, Fulgham P, Clayman R and Preminger G (2018) A Comparison of Renal Damage Induced by Varying Modes of Shock Wave GenerationJournal of Urology, VOL. 145, NO. 4, (864-867), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1991.P. Begun F, Lawson R, Kearns C and Tieu T (2018) Electrohydraulic Shock Wave Induced Renal InjuryJournal of Urology, VOL. 142, NO. 1, (155-159), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1989.Marberger M, Türk C and Steinkogler I (2018) Piezoelelectric Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in ChildrenJournal of Urology, VOL. 142, NO. 2 Part 1, (349-352), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1989.McCullough D, Yeaman L, Bo W, Assimos D, Lawrence Kroovand R, Griffin A and Furr E (2018) Effects of Shock Waves on the Rat OvaryJournal of Urology, VOL. 141, NO. 3 Part 1, (666-669), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1989.Chaussy C and Fuchs G (2018) Current State and Future Developments of Noninvasive Treatment of Human Urinary Stones With Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, VOL. 141, NO. 3 Part 2, (782-789), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1989.Lingeman J, Woods J, Toth P, Evan A and McAteer J (2018) The Role of Lithotripsy and Its Side EffectsJournal of Urology, VOL. 141, NO. 3 Part 2, (793-797), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1989.Palmer B and Norman R (2018) Retroperitoneal Air, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Epidural AnesthesiaJournal of Urology, VOL. 141, NO. 4, (844-845), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1989.Lazare J, Saltzman B and Sotolongo J (2018) Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury PatientsJournal of Urology, VOL. 140, NO. 2, (266-269), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1988.Abrahams C, Lipson S and Ross L (2018) Pathologic Changes in The Kidneys and Other Organs of Dogs Undergoing Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy with A Tubless LithotripterJournal of Urology, VOL. 140, NO. 2, (391-394), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1988.Dretler S and Weinstein A (2018) A Modified Algorithm for the Management of Ureteral Calculi: 100 Consecutive CasesJournal of Urology, VOL. 140, NO. 4, (732-736), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1988.Caldwell T and Burns J (2018) Current Operative Management of Urinary Calculi after Renal TransplantationJournal of Urology, VOL. 140, NO. 6, (1360-1363), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1988. Volume 137Issue 6June 1987Page: 142A Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1987 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information James E. Lingeman More articles by this author Thomas B. Kulb More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lingeman et al. (1987) studied this question.