Why the study?
What are the contemporary pharmacological treatment options for the management and secondary prevention of pulmonary embolism?
What are the contemporary pharmacological treatment options for the management and secondary prevention of pulmonary embolism?
Direct oral anticoagulants are the preferred first-line therapy for non-high risk pulmonary embolism due to a superior risk-benefit ratio and lower bleeding risk compared to traditional vitamin K antagonists.
New anticoagulants may refine non-high-risk PE management; leaves open optimal regimen selection pending further trials.
INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common and potentially severe manifestation of venous thromboembolism. Its management has relied on anticoagulation by vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for the past fifty years. Recently, new alternative drugs have been developed and dramatically modified both the treatment of acute PE and its secondary prevention. Areas covered: This review discusses the contemporary pharmacological treatment for PE, with a focus on anticoagulation options for non-high risk PE. In particular, the advent of direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban and dabigatran) and modalities for long-term prevention will be described. Options for anticoagulation for pregnancy-related PE are presented separately. Expert opinion: Direct oral anticoagulants represent the first-line therapy of non-high risk PE, with better risk-benefit ratios compared with VKA due to lower bleeding risks. In specific groups of patients, however, older generations of anticoagulants such as VKA or heparins still play an important role. Multiple alternatives are available for the secondary prevention of PE, with different efficacies in reducing thrombotic risk and bleeding safety profiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gouin et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: