Why the study?
Does measurement of flow-mediated vasodilation in the seated position provide similar results to the supine position in human subjects?
Does measurement of flow-mediated vasodilation in the seated position provide similar results to the supine position in human subjects?
Measurement of flow-mediated vasodilation in the seated position provides similar results to the supine position, offering a more comfortable and convenient alternative for assessing endothelial function.
Similar FMD results in seated versus supine positions may enable convenient endothelial assessment; leaves open prospective validation before broader adoption.
BACKGROUND: Measurement of flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) is used to assess endothelial function in humans and according to the guidelines, subjects must remain supine during the study. However, measurement of FMD while seated would be more comfortable and convenient for patients, so the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the patient's position on FMD results. METHODS AND RESULTS: High-resolution ultrasonography, a linear array transducer (13 MHz) and an arm-holding device were used to measure arterial diameter in response to reactive hyperemia (FMD, cuff inflated to 50 mmHg above systolic blood pressure for 5 min) and in response to sublingual nitroglycerine (NTG, 75 microg) in 31 subjects, which included those with cardiovascular diseases. There was no significant difference between basal or peak hyperemic blood flow in the seated or supine position. Basal brachial artery diameter, FMD and vascular response to NTG were similar in both positions (basal diameter: 3.8+/-0.4 vs 3.9+/-0.4 mm, FMD: 7.3+/-4.3% vs 7.2+/-4.5%, NTG: 13.1+/-5.1% vs 12.8+/-5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that measurement of FMD in the seated position is as useful as measuring it in the supine position for assessing endothelial function. This flexibility of position is better for patients and physicians, and should lead to more widespread measurement of FMD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soga et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: