Why the study?
Does heart rate reduction with atenolol or ivabradine improve endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without overt cardiovascular disease?
Does heart rate reduction with atenolol or ivabradine improve endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without overt cardiovascular disease?
Atenolol, but not ivabradine, improved endothelial function in T2DM patients despite comparable heart rate reduction, suggesting heart rate reduction alone does not improve endothelial function.
Atenolol may improve endothelial function in T2DM beyond HR reduction; challenges HR lowering alone as the mechanism.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether reduction of heart rate (HR) has beneficial effects on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). DESIGN: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 66 T2DM patients without overt cardiovascular disease. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised to receive for 4 weeks, in addition to their standard therapy, one of the following treatments: atenolol (25 mg twice daily), ivabradine (5 mg twice daily) or placebo (1 tablet twice daily). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Systemic endothelial function, assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD); endothelium-independent vasodilation, assessed by nitrate-mediated dilation (NMD); cardiac autonomic function, assessed by HR variability (HRV). RESULTS: 61 patients completed the study (19, 22 and 20 patients in atenolol, ivabradine and placebo groups, respectively). Compared with baseline, HR was similarly reduced by atenolol (87±13 vs 69±9 bpm) and ivabradine (86±12 to 71±9 bpm), but not by placebo (82±10 vs 81±9 bpm) (p<0.001). FMD improved at follow-up in the atenolol group (4.8±1.7 vs 6.4±1.9%), but not in the ivabradine group (5.2±2.5 vs 4.9±2.2%) and in the placebo group (4.8±1.5 vs 4.7±1.7%) (p<0.01). NMD did not change significantly in any group. HRV parameters did not change in the placebo group; they, instead, consistently increased in the atenolol, whereas a mild increase in SDNNi was only observed in the ivabradine group. A significant correlation was found in the atenolol group between HR and FMD changes (r=-0.48; p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a comparable reduction in HR, atenolol, but not ivabradine, improved FMD in T2DM patients suggesting that changes in HR are by themselves unlikely to significantly improve endothelial function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nerla et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: