Why the study?
Which baseline ECG correction method provides the least variable measurement of moxifloxacin-induced QTc prolongation in healthy subjects?
Which baseline ECG correction method provides the least variable measurement of moxifloxacin-induced QTc prolongation in healthy subjects?
Using 1 or 3 triplicate predose ECGs provides a superior, less variable baseline correction for QTc measurement compared to day -1 time-matched or no baseline correction.
Predose baselines minimize QTc variability in TQT studies; supports their preference over time-matched methods in cardiac safety trials.
This study compares 4 baseline correction methods on the effect of moxifloxacin on the QT/QTc interval: (1) day -1 time-matched baseline electrocardiograms (ECGs), (2) 3 triplicate predose ECGs, (3) 1 triplicate predose ECG, and (4) no baseline correction. Forty-four healthy subjects receive a single dose of moxifloxacin (400 mg), placebo, and 2 doses of an investigational agent in a 4-period crossover fashion. For all 4 methods, the largest mean difference from placebo in the moxifloxacin study-specific QTc is 11.97 to 13.23 ms and occurs at 3 to 4 hours postdose; the lower 90% confidence interval is greater than 5 ms from 2 to 8 hours. The average standard error of the mean is 1.36 ms for 3 triplicate predose ECGs, 1.40 ms for 1 triplicate predose ECG, 1.60 ms for day -1 time-matched baseline ECGs, and 1.65 ms for no baseline correction. Predose baseline methods (3 or 1 triplicate ECGs) are superior to the day -1 time-matched baseline correction or without baseline correction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: