Why the study?
Does urapidil affect blood glucose concentrations in a streptozotocin diabetic rat model?
Does urapidil affect blood glucose concentrations in a streptozotocin diabetic rat model?
Urapidil does not exert a hyperglycaemic effect in experimental diabetes mellitus despite its 5-HT1A receptor agonistic properties, and may even reduce glucose concentrations at higher doses.
Alleviates hyperglycaemia concerns with 5-HT1A agonism in diabetes models; leaves open human translation.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Diabetes mellitus associated with hypertension often causes perioperative complications. The alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist/5-hydroxytryptamine-1A receptor agonist urapidil is an approved drug used in hypertension and hypertensive emergencies. 5-Hydroxytryptamine-1A (5-HT1A) receptor agonists impair glucose metabolism. To evaluate a possible dose-dependent hyperglycaemic effect of urapidil due to its 5-HT1A receptor agonistic properties, the effect of three doses of urapidil on hyperglycaemia in the streptozotocin diabetic rat was investigated. METHODS: Male Wistar-Kyoto rats were made diabetic by streptozotocin and randomly allocated to the following daily treatments for 7 days (n = 6 each): urapidil 6 mg kg(-1), urapidil 20 mg kg(-1), urapidil 60 mg kg(-1), insulin 4 IU kg(-1) subcutaneously. One diabetic group and one non-diabetic healthy group served as controls. RESULTS: Treatment for 7 days with urapidil 20 mg kg(-1) and urapidil 60 mg kg(-1) reduced mean glucose concentrations significantly (urapidil-20: 15.6 +/- 1.1 mmol L(-1), P = 0.023; urapidil-60: 15.8 +/- 0.8 mmol L(-1), P = 0.04) compared with diabetic controls (20.9 +/- 0.8 mmol L(-1)), whereas those after urapidil 6 mg kg(-1) were similar to diabetic controls. Insulin treatment normalized blood glucose concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist/5-HT1A receptor agonist urapidil has no hyperglycaemic effect on experimental diabetes mellitus, even in high doses, despite its 5-HT1A receptor agonistic properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ittner et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: