This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
IMPORTANCE: Chronic kidney disease–associated pruritus (CKD-aP) and depression are common but often underrecognized and undertreated in hemodialysis (HD) patients, lowering quality of life and worsening outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the systematic, repeated collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) integrated into a Plan-Do-Act-Study (PDAS) framework could enhance recognition of CKD-aP and depression and guide treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: 127 adult patients receiving thrice-weekly in-center HD were included. PROMs were captured electronically at predefined phases. INTERVENTIONS: During Adjustment phases, individualized symptom reports were reviewed by physicians, prompting initiation of difelikefalin for CKD-aP or referral to psychiatric care for depressive symptoms. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Changes in itch (Worst-Itch Numerical Rating Scale, WI-NRS) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9) and concordance between patients and nurses. RESULTS: At baseline, 32% of patients versus 9% of nurses reported pruritus (κ = 0.18) and 27% versus 6% reported depression (κ = 0.19). Following PROM-guided interventions, 16 patients initiated difelikefalin (median WI-NRS reduction of 3 points, p < 0.001) and five were referred for psychiatric care (median PHQ-9 reduction of 4.5 points, p = 0.015). Patient–nurse agreement improved to κ = 0.66 for pruritus and κ = 0.65 for depression at study end. Ratings of assessment adequacy rose from 38% to 67% among patients and from 55% to 75% among nurses. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Routine, repeated PROMs markedly improved recognition of CKD-aP and depression, enabled targeted therapy with meaningful relief, and strengthened patient-staff alignment. This PDAS-based strategy supports KDIGO guidance and merits broader adoption to advance patient-centered dialysis care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: