Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We consider the unconstrained minimization of the function F, where F = f + g, f is an expectation-valued nonsmooth convex or strongly convex function, and g is a closed, convex, and proper function. (I) Strongly convex f. When f is μ-strongly convex in x, traditional stochastic subgradient schemes ( SSG ) often display poor behavior, arising in part from noisy subgradients and diminishing steplengths. Instead, we apply a variable sample-size accelerated proximal scheme (VS-APM) on F, the Moreau envelope of F; we term such a scheme as ( mVS-APM ) and in contrast with ( SSG ) schemes, ( mVS-APM ) utilizes constant steplengths and increasingly exact gradients. We consider two settings. (a) Bounded domains. In this setting, ( mVS-APM ) displays linear convergence in inexact gradient steps, each of which requires utilizing an inner ( prox-SSG ) scheme. Specically, ( mVS-APM ) achieves an optimal oracle complexity in prox-SSG steps of [Formula: see text] with an iteration complexity of [Formula: see text] in inexact (outer) gradients of F to achieve an ϵ-accurate solution in mean-squared error, computed via an increasing number of inner (stochastic) subgradient steps; (b) Unbounded domains. In this regime, under an assumption of state-dependent bounds on subgradients, an unaccelerated variant ( mVS-APM ) is linearly convergent where increasingly exact gradients ∇ x F(x) are approximated with increasing accuracy via ( SSG ) schemes. Notably, ( mVS-APM ) also displays an optimal oracle complexity of [Formula: see text]; (II) Convex f. When f is merely convex but smoothable, by suitable choices of the smoothing, steplength, and batch-size sequences, smoothed (VS-APM) (or sVS-APM) achieves an optimal oracle complexity of [Formula: see text] to obtain an ϵ-optimal solution. Our results can be specialized to two important cases: (a) Smooth f. Since smoothing is no longer required, we observe that (VS-APM) admits the optimal rate and oracle complexity, matching prior ndings; (b) Deterministic nonsmooth f. In the nonsmooth deterministic regime, (sVS-APM) reduces to a smoothed accelerated proximal method (s-APM) that is both asymptotically convergent and optimal in that it displays a complexity of [Formula: see text], matching the bound provided by Nesterov in 2005 for producing ϵ-optimal solutions. Finally, (sVS-APM) and (VS-APM) produce sequences that converge almost surely to a solution of the original problem. Funding: The first and second authors would like to acknowledge support from NSF CMMI-1538605, DOE ARPA-E award DE-AR0001076, and the Gary and Sheila Bello Chair funds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jalilzadeh et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: