Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights the need to reduce disparities in the evidence base and care provision for angina and stable cardiovascular disease across different ethnic and regional groups.
For decades, there has been great interest in ethnic differences in the management of angina and stable cardiovascular disease. Clinical decisionmaking is known to be both consciously and unconsciously influenced by a patient's demographics, and this is due to in part to differences in clinical guidance and opinion. However, the evidence supporting such decision-making is sparse. Nonetheless, there is overwhelming evidence that international, national, regional, institutional, departmental and individual bias disproportionately affect subgroups of the population, resulting in adverse patient outcomes. While without doubt there will be rapid advancements in individualised therapies over the coming years and decades, the most beneficial immediate action clinicians can take is to reduce disparities in both the evidence base and care provision. Doing so will require great collaborative effort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barton et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: