Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
As a promising catalyst for methanol synthesis from CO 2 hydrogenation, In 2 O 3 has attracted considerable interest due to its high methanol selectivity. Understanding the structure–activity relationship is of critical importance to guide the design of an optimized In 2 O 3 catalyst. By combining density functional theory calculations with microkinetic modeling, we systematically investigated the methanol synthesis over In 2 O 3 (111) and In 2 O 3 (110). The calculated surface phase diagram suggests that no lattice oxygen exists in the top few layers of In 2 O 3 surfaces under experimental conditions. The theoretical activity volcano indicates that there is a clear relationship between the number of reduced surface In layers and the catalytic activity of In 2 O 3 (111) with an optimum of one to two reduced layers. We further explain why the methanol formation activity of the In 2 O 3 catalyst can be optimized by tuning the number of reduced layers through the effect of adding a ZrO 2 support. This work provides an explanation of the low activity of the pure In 2 O 3 catalyst and provides a theoretical insight into how to improve the activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: