Why the study?
Assessing the usability of the smartphone-based SmartMed app can ensure the value of oral anticoagulant app development and adoption for promoting patient self-management, medication adherence, and data collection.
Is the SmartMed app considered usable and impactful by patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals for managing oral anticoagulation therapy?
Is the SmartMed app considered usable and impactful by patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals for managing oral anticoagulation therapy?
The SmartMed app demonstrated high usability and perceived impact among patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals for managing oral anticoagulation therapy.
SmartMed app usability supports pilot testing in OAC patients; leaves open effects on adherence, safety, and outcomes.
Oral anticoagulants (OAC) are recommended for preventing stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation. Proper use is imperative for maximizing anticoagulation therapy’s effectiveness and safety. In preparation for the implementation of a smartphone-based SmartMed app (application) aiming to promote patient self-management, medication adherence, and data collection for patients on anticoagulation therapy, its usability assessment can ensure the value of OAC app development and adoption. We evaluated the SmartMed app’s usability using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the app-specific domain of the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) for its perceived impact on taking OAC regularly. We recruited 25 OAC users and their home caregivers and 59 healthcare professionals, including pharmacists, nurses, and cardiac surgeons from one medical center and one regional hospital in Taiwan. All participants (n = 84) thought the SmartMed app was useful, with mean SUS and MARS scores of 81.49 (±14.42) and 4.65 (±0.49), respectively. Usability evaluation revealed that fewer experiences with smartphone apps and different healthcare professionals (pharmacists versus nurses or cardiac surgeons) were associated with lower SUS scores and perceived impact. Throughout the evaluation process, the SmartMed app’s design was considered helpful from multiple stakeholders’ perspectives. Further ongoing mobile technology supports are necessary to establish the SmartMed app’s effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: