Why the study?
Hypocalcemia may contribute to sudden cardiac death in CKD by slowing sinus node pacemaking, but whether inter-species differences exist in the response to extracellular calcium changes was unknown.
Does hypocalcemia differentially affect sinus node pacemaking cycle length across species?
Does hypocalcemia differentially affect sinus node pacemaking cycle length across species?
Hypocalcemia induces a pronounced bradycardic effect in human sinus node models but not in small animal models, indicating that human models are necessary to study hypocalcemia-induced bradycardic sudden cardiac death.
No immediate clinical implications for calcium management in CKD; leaves open whether hypocalcemia slows sinus node pacemaking enough to cause SCD.
Changes of serum and extracellular ion concentrations occur regularly in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recently, hypocalcemia, i.e. a decrease of the extra-cellular calcium concentration [ Ca 2+ ] o , has been suggested as potential pathomechanism contributing to the unexplained high rate of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in CKD patients. In particular, there is a hypothesis that hypocalcaemia could slow down natural pacemaking in the human sinus node to fatal degrees. Here, we address the question whether there are inter-species differences in the response of cellular sinus node pacemaking to changes of [ Ca 2+ ] o . Towards this end, we employ computational models of mouse, rabbit and human sinus node cells. The Fabbri et al. human model was updated to consider changes of intracellular ion concentrations. We identified crucial inter-species differences in the response of cellular pacemaking in the sinus node to changes of [ Ca 2+ ] o with little changes of cycle length in mouse and rabbit models (<83 ms) in contrast to a pronounced bradycardic effect in the human model (up to > 1000 ms). Our results suggest that experiments with human sinus node cells are required to investigate the potential mechanism of hypocalcaemia-induced bradycardic SCD in CKD patients and small animal models are not well suited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loewe et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: