Why the study?
Does family involvement in patient education improve medical treatment compliance and blood pressure in patients with hypertension?
Does family involvement in patient education improve medical treatment compliance and blood pressure in patients with hypertension?
Patient education that includes a family member significantly improves medical treatment compliance and blood pressure management in patients with hypertension.
Patient-family education improves HTN compliance and BP control; extends RCT evidence for family-centered interventions in chronic disease.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of family involvement in patient education on hypertension (HTN) management. This single-blind randomized, parallel group controlled trial was conducted in Sayyed-Al Shohada hospital in Urmia. One hundred participants who met inclusion criteria were selected by convenience sampling and randomly allocated into control, patient-oriented, family-oriented and patient and family-oriented groups. Interactive educational interventions were given to three intervention groups for four months. The control group received routine care. The Hill-Bone Compliance to High Blood Pressure Therapy Scale and a mercury manometer were used to collect data. Data was analyzed using SPSS V20. The results showed a significant difference in the mean scores of the medical treatment compliance (primary outcome) and blood pressure (BP) among four study groups after the intervention (p < 0.0001). Tukey’s test revealed that medical treatment compliance significantly improved in the patient and family-oriented group compared to other groups after the intervention (p < 0.0001). Family involvement in patient education had a beneficial effect on treatment compliance and patient outcomes. Patients education with the presence of a family member will promote adopting a healthier lifestyle and better managing BP in patients with HTN. It will eventually reduce the medical cost for patients and healthcare systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maslakpak et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: