Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The absolute asymmetric synthesis of the title complexes Λ-(+) D - cis -[CoBr(NH 3 )(en) 2 ]Br 2 ( 1 ) and Δ-(-) D - cis -[CoBr(NH 3 )(en) 2 ]Br 2 ( 2 ) (en=1,2-ethylenediamine) as well as the improved optical resolution of cis -[CoBr(NH 3 )(en) 2 ]Br 2 ·2H 2 O( 3 ) are described in detail. The products were characterized by means of elemental analysis, TG-DTA, optical rotation, UV-Vis, and CD spectra. The distribution of enantiomeric excess (ee) of cis -[CoBr(NH 3 )(en) 2 ]Br 2 in the absolute asymmetric synthesis was obtained by the measurements of their CD spectra. It was found that the complete resolution of rac- cis -[CoBr(NH 3 )(en) 2 ]Br 2 ·2H 2 O was achieved by the use of NH 4 ( d -BCS)(ammonium d -α-bromocamphor-π-sulfonate) or NH 4 ( l -BCS) while NH 4 ( dl -BCS) could only be resolved partially by chiral cis -[CoBr(NH 3 )(en) 2 ]Br 2 under the same conditions. It is deduced that there are notable differences in the chiral discrimination of the reciprocal resolution between cis -[CoBr(NH 3 )(en) 2 ]Br 2 and NH 4 BCS. In addition, a new “catalysis-crystal induction” mechanism in the preparation of the chiral Co(III) complex is put forward.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ZHANG et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: