Why the study?
EWSR1 translocation-negative tumors represent a minor portion of small round cell tumors consistent with Ewing sarcoma morphology, prompting investigation into differentiating them from EWSR1-positive tumors using PET-CT features.
Can PET-CT features (SUVmax and HU) differentiate between EWSR1 translocation-positive and negative tumors in Ewing sarcoma patients?
Can PET-CT features (SUVmax and HU) differentiate between EWSR1 translocation-positive and negative tumors in Ewing sarcoma patients?
Higher SUVmax and lower HU on PET-CT can help differentiate EWSR1-negative from EWSR1-positive Ewing sarcoma tumors, potentially reflecting tumor aggressiveness.
Higher SUVmax on PET-CT may flag EWSR1-negative Ewing tumors pre-biopsy; leaves open whether this refines diagnosis or prognosis.
OBJECTIVES: Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 (EWSR1) translocation-negative tumors represent a minor portion of small round cell tumors consistent with Ewing sarcoma morphology. The purpose of this study was to differentiate EWSR1 translocation-positive tumors from EWSR1 translocation-negative tumors using PET-computed tomography features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study 27, Ewing sarcoma patients (December 2011 to November 2016) were divided into two groups, EWSR1 translocation-positive and EWSR1 translocation-negative based on cytogenetic analysis. Pretreatment standardized uptake value maximum (SUVmax) and Hounsfield Units (HU) were measured in the primary tumor in the axial slice with the largest tumor diameter.The associations between SUVmax, HU and the presence of EWSR1 translocation were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine cut-off levels of SUVmax and HU suggestive of EWSR1-negative tumors. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were classified as EWSR1-positive and six as EWSR1-negative. Eighteen had SUVmax and 21 had HU measurements. EWSR1-negative tumors had significantly higher SUVmax values (P = 0.003) and significantly lower HU values (P = 0.008). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that SUVmax had diagnostic ability to discriminate between EWSR1-negative and EWSR1-positive tumors (area under the curve = 0.964, P = 0.006). A SUVmax of at least 10 had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 85.7% for EWSR1-negative tumors. HU had lower diagnostic ability than SUVmax (area under the curve = 0.881, P = 0.012). A HU up to 57 had a sensitivity of 81.3% and specificity of 80.0% for EWSR1-negative tumors. CONCLUSION: Higher SUVmax and lower HU may differentiate between EWSR1-positive and EWSR1-negative tumors. This may reflect EWSR1-negative tumor aggressiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soffer et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: