Key result
18F-FDG PET-CT finds additional lesions in ~21% of Ewing sarcoma patients without altering planned treatment.
Why the study?
The role of 18F-FDG PET-CT in staging Ewing sarcoma compared to conventional imaging methods is still under evaluation.
Does 18F-FDG PET-CT improve staging and lesion detection compared to conventional imaging in children and young adults with Ewing sarcoma?
Cohort (n=19)
Yes
Does 18F-FDG PET-CT improve staging and lesion detection compared to conventional imaging in children and young adults with Ewing sarcoma?
18F-FDG PET-CT increases the detection of metastases in Ewing sarcoma but has a high rate of false positives, necessitating supplementary imaging or biopsy.
Should not yet change staging practice in Ewing sarcoma; leaves open whether added detection improves outcomes in prospective trials.
Ewing sarcoma (ES) is currently staged using Radiography, ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and skeletal scintigraphy (bone scan). 18 F- fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET-CT) is increasingly used for staging and follow-up, but its role is still under evaluation. To evaluate the added information from 18 F-FDG PET-CT studies compared to conventional imaging and to estimate radiation doses received from radiological and nuclear medicine imaging during staging of Ewing sarcoma. Sixty-one patients under the age of 30 years (mean 16, range 5–26) were diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma in Norway during the period 2005–2012. Nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria for this population-based study: pre therapeutic 18 F-FDG PET-CT and a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Imaging reports, medical records and pathology reports were collected and compared for all patients. Biopsy histology, supplementary imaging and long-term follow-up (median 27 months) were taken as composite gold standard. 18 F-FDG PET-CT detected more lesions than conventional imaging in four patients (21%) but this did not change planned treatment as they all had extensive metastatic disease. The 18 F-FDG PET-CT study was false negative in one patient and showed false positive lesions in three patients (16%). The estimated mean (range) effective total radiation dose was from CT: 7 mSv (2–16), skeletal scintigraphy: 3 mSv (0–5) and 18 F-FDG PET-CT: 5 mSv (4–6). 18 F-FDG PET-CT is useful for staging of Ewing sarcoma and increase detection of metastases. False positive lesions are quite common, emphasizing the need for supplementary imaging or biopsy of suspected FDG positive metastases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnsen et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Ewing sarcoma (n=19). 18F-FDG PET-CT vs. Conventional imaging (ultrasound, radiography, CT, MRI, skeletal scintigraphy) was evaluated on Detection of additional lesions compared to conventional imaging. 18F-FDG PET-CT detected more metastatic lesions than conventional imaging in 21% of patients with Ewing sarcoma, though it did not alter planned treatment and yielded false positive lesions in 16%.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: