Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Senescing apple leaves absorbed 80% of applied urea in 48 hr with greater absorption in light than in darkness. The amount of urea absorbed paralleled the increase in the concn of soluble N and urea N. The bulk of the increase in soluble N was urea and the changes in total soluble N paralleled the changes in urea N. During leaf senescence, chlorophyll, total N and protein declined and much of this N was translocated into storage tissues. Trees which received a post-harvest urea spray produced a significantly greater amount of shoot growth and fruit set of apples than trees receiving no urea or a soil application of urea. The yield was not significantly different between trees receiving a 5% urea spray and trees receiving the soil application of urea. However, the efficiency of N utilization by a 5% urea spray was 4-fold greater than the soil application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shim et al. (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: