Workplace health promotion (WHP) programs are crucial for safeguarding the well-being of healthcare workers (HCWs), who face unique challenges such as night shift work (NSW), exposure to hazardous substances, and high stress levels. These factors significantly contribute to adverse short-term and long-term health outcomes, including cardiovascular diseases, metabolic disorders, and increased cancer risk. Despite these challenges, tailored WHP strategies specifically designed for the healthcare sector are currently lacking. This study protocol aims to address this gap by conducting comprehensive health and occupational assessments during medical surveillance of participating HCWs. The assessments will evaluate their occupational and psychological well-being, sleep health, and dietary habits by using a combined approach. The administration of subjective self-assessment questionnaires (NIOSH WellBQ, Work Ability Index, PSQI, ESS, MEDI-lite) will gather HCWs' perceptions and experiences related to their sleep, dietary health, and work well-being. Additionally, objective biomarker measurements (including blood inflammatory markers, lipid profiles, vitamin D levels, salivary cortisol, alpha-amylase, and melatonin) will provide quantitative data on physiological indicators relevant to cardiovascular health, sleep perturbations and stress status. Following the assessment phase, tailored health advisories will be provided to each participant based on their specific health profiles and needs. Furthermore, a 12-month follow-up will verify the effectiveness of these tailored WHP interventions. Overall, the suggested protocol is expected to inform targeted strategies aimed at promoting health, improving workplace safety, and guiding occupational policy development. Furthermore, the protocol’s insights can extend beyond healthcare, offering valuable implications for industries facing similar challenges associated with shift work, thereby holding promise for enhancing workplace wellness globally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vivarelli et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: