Why the study?
Post-systolic shortening is an important indicator for early identification of myocardial dysfunction, but its predictive value on adverse events in stable CAD with preserved systolic function needed investigation.
Does post-systolic shortening (PSS) assessed by automated functional imaging improve the prediction of adverse events compared to global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with stable CAD and preserved LVEF?
Does post-systolic shortening (PSS) assessed by automated functional imaging improve the prediction of adverse events compared to global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with stable CAD and preserved LVEF?
Post-systolic shortening is an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular events in stable CAD patients with preserved LVEF, offering superior prognostic value to global longitudinal strain, especially in patients with normal or mildly reduced GLS.
PSS by AFI may flag higher-risk stable CAD with preserved LVEF; leaves open incremental prognostic value.
BACKGROUND: Post-systolic shortening (PSS) is an important indicator for early identifying myocardial dysfunction. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of PSS assessed with speckle tracking automated functional imaging (AFI) on adverse events in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and preserved systolic function. METHODS: A total of 204 consecutive patients clinically diagnosed with stable CAD and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 50% were included. Multiple parameters were analyzed with AFI technique. The composite endpoint included all-cause mortality, heart failure, myocardial infarction and stroke. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR 19-28 months), 30 patients (14.7%) reached the endpoint. Patients experiencing the endpoint had a lower absolute global longitudinal strain (GLS), a higher post-systolic index (PSI), and more left ventricle walls displaying PSS than patients without events. PSI (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04-1.27; p = 0.005) and per 1 increase in the number of left ventricle walls with PSS (hazard ratio 1.52, 95% CI 1.21-1.91, p < 0.000) were independent predictors of the endpoint, whereas GLS was not significantly associated with the endpoint after adjustment models. For patients with absolute value of GLS > 15.4%, a significant prognostic superiority was found in PSI compared with GLS (AUC = 0.73 [PSI] vs. 0.58 [GLS], p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: PSS is an independent predictor for adverse events in stable CAD patients with preserved systolic function, and the prognostic value may be superior to GLS in patients with normal or mildly reduced GLS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: