Why the study?
What are the mortality and clinical outcomes of aortic valve surgery in elderly patients over 70 years of age?
What are the mortality and clinical outcomes of aortic valve surgery in elderly patients over 70 years of age?
Aortic valve replacement in elderly patients over 70 years old is associated with acceptable mortality and significant clinical improvement, justifying an aggressive surgical approach in appropriate candidates.
Should not yet change practice in elderly AVR candidates; Level 5 evidence leaves open need for controlled studies.
Forty patients over the age of 70 years, with an average age of 74.6 years, have undergone aortic valve surgery at the Massachusetts General Hospital in the past eight years. Thirty-eight patients had calcific aortic stenosis, and two had aortic insufficiency. Debridement of the aortic valve was performed early in our experience in the surgical treatment of aortic stenosis in four patients, three of whom survived. Two of these patients as well as the other thirty-six underwent prosthetic aortic valve replacement. In this group of 40 patients, 32 of whom were in cardiac class IV, there were eight hospital deaths (20%) and three late deaths (7.5%). The 29 survivors are all much improved, and some spectacularly so. These results justify an aggressive approach to aortic valve replacement in the elderly, if the patient's general status warrants it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William G. Austen (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: