Why the study?
Important sex-related differences exist in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome, but scientific evidence regarding the benefit of different therapies in frail women is very scarce.
Elderly women with ACS are disproportionately affected by frailty and atypical presentations, leading to under-treatment and worse outcomes, highlighting the need for tailored, multidisciplinary management.
Clinicians should account for atypical ACS presentations in elderly women to avoid delays; hypothesis-generating regarding interventions to close sex gaps.
There are important sex-related differences in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Women are older, more frequently frail, and present more comorbidities than men. Atypical symptoms at presentation are also more common in female patients, they are leaded to a delayed diagnosis and treatment. Coronary angiography and subsequent revascularization are frequently underused in elderly women and they tend to receive less guidelines-recommended therapies. The prognosis in elderly frail women with ACS is poor, and it is with high mortality and readmissions rates. Bleeding is recurrent ischemic events in which it is more frequent in women than in men. Recovery time might be long, and a multidisciplinary approach is desirable to improve prognosis and quality of life. Further studies are needed in order to clarify the benefit of the different therapies in the group of frail women, and this is particularly true for revascularization, as scientific evidence in this group is very scarce.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vicent et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: