Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: This cluster randomized controlled trial assessed the effect of a two-day in-person pesticide safety training with or without text messages grounded in behavioral change theory on knowledge, attitude, and practice scores, exposure intensity scores (EIS) during application, and self-reported signs and symptoms of pesticide poisoning among 539 Ugandan smallholder farmers. Methods: Twelve subcounties were randomized into three groups: educational (n = 180), educational + text messages (n = 179), or control (n = 180). Intervention effects were estimated with mixed-effects regression models using baseline (2021) and follow-up (2022) data. Results: Knowledge scores increased by 4.4% (95% CI: 0.9, 7.8) and 6.1% (95% CI: 2.7, 9.6) in the educational and in the education + text messages groups, respectively. Attitudes increased by 6.6% (95% CI: 1.8, 11.4) with text messages. Practice scores showed no significant change. Both interventions reduced pesticide exposure, and text messages reduced signs and symptoms of pesticide poisoning by 1.1% (95% CI: -1.7, -0.3). Conclusion: The limited changes in general practices suggest that generic and content-heavy training programs may hinder implementation. Tailored behavior change approaches, identifying and addressing locally relevant practices and psychosocial drivers, may enhance farmer safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ssekkadde et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: