Why the study?
The review aimed to highlight the strengths and acknowledge the weak points of the VTE-BLEED risk score to properly position its use in current medical practice.
Does the VTE-BLEED risk score accurately predict major bleeding events in patients with venous thromboembolism receiving stable anticoagulant therapy?
Does the VTE-BLEED risk score accurately predict major bleeding events in patients with venous thromboembolism receiving stable anticoagulant therapy?
The VTE-BLEED risk score is a validated, simple, and objective tool that effectively stratifies bleeding risk in VTE patients on stable anticoagulation, aiding in decisions regarding extended therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
VTE-BLEED may guide extended anticoagulation decisions after VTE; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major healthcare problem due to its high incidence, significant mortality rate from pulmonary embolism, high recurrence rate and morbidity from long-term complications. After a first episode of VTE all patients must receive anticoagulant treatment for 3 months. Further anticoagulation is recommended in patients without transient risk factors for VTE or patients with active cancer, if they are not at a high risk for bleeding. The VTE-BLEED risk score was created with the purpose of enabling a better stratification of the bleeding risk during stable anticoagulation after a first VTE. Currently, it is the most validated risk score in VTE settings (selected and non-selected cohorts). It has a good prediction power for major bleeding events in patients receiving any of the currently available classes of oral anticoagulants, and it can identify patients at risk of intracranial and fatal bleeding events. The aim of our review was to highlight the strengths of the VTE-BLEED risk score, to acknowledge its weak points and to properly position its use in current medical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bădescu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: