Why the study?
Does candesartan affect caveolin-1 expression and cell proliferation in human metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma cells?
Does candesartan affect caveolin-1 expression and cell proliferation in human metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma cells?
Candesartan decreases caveolin-1 expression and inhibits angiotensin II-induced proliferation in metastatic prostate cancer cells, suggesting a potential therapeutic role for AT1 receptor blockers in prostate cancer.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Candesartan effects in prostate cancer cells warrant further study; leaves open any clinical role for AT1 blockade.
INTRODUCTION: Caveolin-1, the major structural protein of caveolae, interacts directly with the AT1 receptor. The biological functions of caveolin-1 in cancer are compound, multifaceted, and depend on cell type, tumour grade and cancer stage. The AT1-R-caveolin complex in caveolae may coordinate angiotensin II (Ang II) induced signalling. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the angiotensin II receptor type 1 blocker candesartan on caveolin expression in human metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma cells PC-3. MATERIAL AND METHODS: WST-1 and BrdU assays were used as indicators of cell viability and proliferation after angiotensin II and/or candesartan stimulation. Real-time RT-PCR and western blot were used to study the effect of Ang II and/or candesartan on the expression of Cav-1 and AT1-R in PC-3 cells. RESULTS: We found that the expression of caveolin-1 mRNA in the PC-3 cells treated with CV was significantly decreased in comparison with the control (2.9 ±0.17, 4.7 ±0.6, p < 0.05), whereas a higher caveolin-1 mRNA expression was observed in those after Ang II treatment (6.0 ±0.43, 4.7 ±0.6, p < 0.05). Protein analysis indicate that the expression of caveolin-1 protein in the PC-3 cells treated with candesartan was significantly decreased when compared with the control (0.69 ±0.05, 1.6 ±0.12, p < 0.05), whereas higher caveolin-1 protein expression was observed after Ang II treatment (2.5 ±0.20, 1.6 ±0.12, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide new information on the action of candesartan and may improve the knowledge about AT1 receptor inhibitors, which can be potentially useful in prostate cancer therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piastowska‐Ciesielska et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: