Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Diiron diselenolato complexes have been prepared as models of the active site of [FeFe]-hydrogenases. Treatment of Fe 3 (CO) 12 with 1 equiv of 1,3-diselenocyanatopropane ( 1 ) in THF at reflux afforded the model compound Fe 2 (μ-Se 2 C 3 H 6 )(CO) 6 ( 2 ) in 68% yield. The analogous methyl-substituted complex, Fe 2 (μ-Se 2 C 3 H 5 CH 3 )(CO) 6 ( 3 ), was obtained from the reaction of Fe 3 (CO) 12 with the in situ generated compound 3-methyl-1,2-diselenolane ( 4 ). In contrast, the reaction of Fe 3 (CO) 12 with 1,3,5-triselenacyclohexane ( 5 ) produced a mixture of Fe 2 (μ 2,κ-Se,C-SeCH 2 SeCH 2 )(CO) 6 ( 6 ), Fe 2 [(μ-SeCH 2 ) 2 Se](CO) 6 ( 7 ), and Fe 2 (μ-Se 2 CH 2 )(CO) 6 ( 8 ). Compounds 2, 3, 6, and 7 were characterized by IR, 1 H, 13 C, and 77 Se NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, elemental analysis, and X-ray single-crystal structure analysis. The He I and He II photoelectron spectra for 3 are reported, and the electronic structure is further analyzed with the aid of DFT computations. The calculated reorganization energy of the cation of 3 to the “rotated” structure, which has a semibridging carbonyl ligand, is less than that of the analogous complexes with sulfur instead of selenium. Complexes 2 and 3 have been proved to be catalysts for electrochemical reduction of protons from the weak acids pivalic and acetic acid, respectively, to give hydrogen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harb et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: