Why the study?
What are the reasons for telemetry use and the frequency of clinically significant telemetry events in patients on a general medicine service?
What are the reasons for telemetry use and the frequency of clinically significant telemetry events in patients on a general medicine service?
This study aims to characterize the use and clinical yield of telemetry monitoring in general medical patients, an area with limited evidence compared to cardiac populations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Telemetry use in general medicine remains poorly defined; this cohort extends descriptive data but leaves open prospective evaluation of yield.
Telemetry is a powerful tool for real-time monitoring of a patient's heart rhythm and QRS pattern. Beds with telemetry monitoring are limited and expensive in most institutions; therefore, the use of this resource would ideally be evidence based. 1 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines provide class I, II, and III indications for the use of telemetry, but the focus is almost exclusively on cardiac diagnoses, such as admissions for rule-out acute coronary syndrome or heart block. 2 However, there are far fewer data that describe criteria for the use of telemetry in a general medical population. In the largest study of telemetry to date, only 121 of 2240 patients (5%) who underwent telemetry were admitted with noncardiac diagnoses. Weperformed a study to better characterize the reasons why patients on a medicine service are placed on telemetry monitoring as well as the frequency of clinically significant telemetry events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Najafi et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: