Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The adoption of environmentally friendly transportation is essential for sustainable development. Although numerous policies promote public bus transport, there has been insufficient analysis of their actual impact. This article presents a new framework that integrates demand, supply and electricity consumption using the A-S-I-F-E (Activity, Shift in modal share, change in Intensity, change in Fuel and Electricity generation). The study examines the impact of a transport policy on carbon emissions through a case study on the renovation and electrification of the bus fleet in the Piedmont Region. A pseudo-panel approach, based on household surveys from 2013 to 2022, is employed. Results indicate a significant increase in public bus transport following the application of the Synthetic Difference-in-Difference (SDiD) method. In terms of emissions, reductions in CO, NO X , CO 2 , PM 2.5 and CH 4 were observed, while emissions of NMVOCs and N 2 O increased. Consequently, combining demand- and supply-side should be promoted to reduce emissions effectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casquet et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: