Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A solar photospheric "thermal profiling" analysis is presented, exploiting the infrared (2.3-4.6 μm) rovibrational bands of carbon monoxide (CO) as observed with the McMath-Pierce Fourier transform spectrometer (FTS) at Kitt Peak, and from above the Earth's atmosphere by the Shuttle-borne ATMOS experiment. Visible continuum intensities and center-limb behavior constrained the temperature profile of the deep photosphere, while CO center-limb behavior defined the thermal structure at higher altitudes. The oxygen abundance was self-consistently determined from weak CO absorptions (for C/O ≡ 0.5). Our analysis was meant to complement recent studies based on three-dimensional (3D) convection models, which, among other things, have revised the historical solar oxygen (and carbon) abundance downward by a factor of nearly 2, although in fact our conclusions do not support such a revision. Based on various considerations, an O = 700 ± 100 ppm (parts per million relative to hydrogen) is recommended; the large uncertainty reflects the model sensitivity of CO. New solar isotopic ratios also are reported: 12 C/ 13 C = 80 ± 1, 16 O/ 17 O = 1700 ± 220, and 16 O/ 18 O = 440 ± 6—all significantly lower than terrestrial. CO synthesis experiments utilizing a stripped down version of the 3D model—which has large temperature fluctuations in the middle photosphere, possibly inconsistent with CO "movies" from the Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (IRIS), and a steeper mean temperature gradient than matches visible continuum center-limb measurements—point to a lower oxygen abundance (~500 ppm) and isotopic ratios closer to terrestrial. A low oxygen abundance from CO—and other molecules like OH—thus hinges on the reality of the theoretically predicted midphotospheric convective properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayres et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: