Why the study?
While ACEi/ARB use is established in mild-to-moderate CKD, data in individuals with advanced CKD are limited and conflicting, and the definition of advanced CKD varies across clinical trials.
Does ACEi/ARB therapy provide benefits in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease?
Does ACEi/ARB therapy provide benefits in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease?
ACEi/ARB therapy should generally be continued in advanced CKD with close monitoring, but de novo initiation lacks sufficient evidence.
Limited conflicting data on ACEi/ARB in advanced CKD warrant caution; leaves open optimal use pending dedicated trials.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To present the available data on the risks and benefits for ACEi/ARB usage in patients with advanced CKD. RECENT FINDINGS: It has been well established that ACEi/ARB use is beneficial in patients with mild-to-moderate CKD, especially in patients with proteinuria. The majority of available data includes patients with diabetes mellitus. However, data in individuals with advanced CKD are limited. Additionally, data available for this subset of patients is conflicting and the definition of advanced CKD varies across clinical trials. SUMMARY: On the basis of our literature review, evidence suggests continuing ACEi/ARB therapy in patients with advanced CKD (eGFR less than 15 ml/min/1.73 m) unless hyperkalemia ensues unresponsive to therapy, hypotension develops or have unusually rapid worsening of eGFR (not usual progressive decline). These patients should be monitored closely. There is not enough data to support starting ACEi/ARBs de novo in patients with advanced CKD (eGFR less than 15 ml/min/1.73 m). If RAS blockade is started de novo in this subgroup, we recommend close monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: