Why the study?
Does rosuvastatin 10 mg/day improve lipid profile and carotid intima-media thickness compared to atorvastatin 20 mg/day in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia?
Does rosuvastatin 10 mg/day improve lipid profile and carotid intima-media thickness compared to atorvastatin 20 mg/day in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia?
Rosuvastatin 10 mg/day is more effective than atorvastatin 20 mg/day in reducing LDL-cholesterol and regressing carotid intima-media thickness in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.
May support rosuvastatin over atorvastatin for LDL-C and CIMT effects in HeFH; hypothesis-generating, RCTs needed before practice change.
Aims of study: This study compares changes in lipid profile and carotid intima-media thickness and their use as surrogate biomarkers, after treatment with atorvastatin and rosuvastatin given to hypercholesterolemia patients. Methodology: Lipid profile was done after overnight fasting in patients with history of hypercholesterolemia or family history of premature coronary artery diseases. B-mode ultrasonography was done to measure mean carotid intima-media thickness on a Toshiba (M# SSA-580A/E2) ultrasound scanner with linear probe. Both treatment groups, one on atorvastatin (20 mg) and other on rosuvastatin (10 mg) were followed-up for two years. Results: Total of forty two patients of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia were followed -up for two years. Total cholesterol reduction was (45%) and LDL-cholesterol (48%) in patients on rosuvastatin 10 mg/day, as compared to total cholesterol reduction (36%) and LDL-cholesterol (37%) in patients on atorvastatin 20 mg/day (**p < 0.001). The mean CIMT regression in both treatment groups was significant (0.11 mm) in rosuvastatin treatment group and (0.08 mm) in atorvastatin treatment group (*p < 0.02). Conclusion: This study has shown better efficacy of rosuvastatin as compared to atorvastatin in reduction of LDLcholesterol and carotid – intima media thickness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: