Key result
Rosuvastatin slows carotid IMT progression by ~78% vs pravastatin in high-risk patients.
Why the study?
Comprehensive control of risk factors is indispensable for managing atherosclerosis, but the effect of intensive lipid-lowering therapy with rosuvastatin on carotid IMT in high-risk patients needed evaluation.
Does intensive lipid-lowering therapy with rosuvastatin reduce progression of carotid intima-media thickness in high-risk patients with hypercholesterolemia compared to conventional therapy with pravastatin?
RCT (n=200)
open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE)
dynamic allocation method
Yes
Does intensive lipid-lowering therapy with rosuvastatin reduce progression of carotid intima-media thickness in high-risk patients with hypercholesterolemia compared to conventional therapy with pravastatin?
Intensive lipid-lowering therapy with rosuvastatin significantly reduced the progression of carotid intima-media thickness compared to conventional pravastatin therapy in high-risk Japanese patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intensive rosuvastatin slowed IMT progression versus pravastatin in high-risk patients regardless of risk factors; confirms aggressive LDL-C lowering benefits in this RCT population.
Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), a measure of atherosclerosis, is modulated by multiple risk factors. Accordingly, comprehensive control of risk factors is indispensable for management of atherosclerosis. In this study, as a posthoc analysis of the JART Study we planned two analyses. In the main analysis, we evaluated the effect of intensive lipid-lowering therapy with rosuvastatin on carotid IMT in high-risk patients. We also evaluated efficacy in the presence or absence of each risk factor using the full analysis population in the JART Study. Patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 140 mg/dL and max-IMT ≥ 1.1 mm were randomized to rosuvastatin or pravastatin therapy for 12 months. Dosages were allowed to increase to 10 mg/day and 20 mg/day to achieve LDL-goals (aggressive goals for rosuvastatin group and guideline goals for pravastatin group). For the main analysis, we assessed 200 high-risk patients (105 in the rosuvastatin group), as category III or secondary prevention according to the Japan Atherosclerosis Society guideline 2007, whereas we assessed 289 patients in the other analysis. Rosuvastatin significantly slowed the percentage change in mean-IMT at 12 months compared with pravastatin (1.40 ± 10.03% versus 6.43 ± 13.77%, P = 0.005). LDL-C was reduced by 48.1% in the rosuvastatin group and 27.9% in the pravastatin group. The rate of achieving the LDL-C goal was significantly greater in the rosuvastatin group compared with the pravastatin group (P < 0.001). Rosuvastatin slowed the change in mean-IMT in the presence of every risk factor. Thus, intensive lipid-lowering therapy reduced progression of carotid IMT in high-risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yokoi et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Hypercholesterolemia and Atherosclerosis (n=200). Rosuvastatin vs. Pravastatin (10-20 mg/day) was evaluated on Percentage change in mean carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) at 12 months (p=0.005). Intensive lipid-lowering therapy with rosuvastatin significantly slowed the percentage change in mean carotid intima-media thickness at 12 months compared to pravastatin (1.40% vs 6.43%, p=0.005) in high-risk patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: