Why the study?
Is the continuous suture technique for aortic valve replacement safe and effective in terms of mortality and perivalvular leak?
Is the continuous suture technique for aortic valve replacement safe and effective in terms of mortality and perivalvular leak?
The continuous suture technique for aortic valve replacement is an effective method associated with low early mortality in isolated cases and a low incidence of perivalvular leak.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Continuous suture AVR associated with low mortality and PVL in this cohort; supports further study but leaves comparative efficacy open.
The continuous suture technique has been proposed as an alternate method for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Advantages include a decreased ischemic and bypass time. Despite reports of a low incidence of perivalvular leak, wide use of the continuous suture technique has not been adopted. This report reviews our experience with the continuous suture technique. From January 1984 through November 1991, 181 consecutive patients underwent AVR using the continuous suture technique. The mean age was 61 years (range 6 to 88 years). Diagnoses included pure aortic stenosis (AS) in 41%, aortic insufficiency (AI) in 31%, and a combination of AS and AI in 28%. Fifty-six patients underwent isolated AVR and 125 underwent AVR combined with other procedures. The overall early mortality was 5.5%. Early mortality for isolated AVR was 0% (0/56) and was 8.0% (10/125) for those undergoing concomitant procedures. Late mortality was 4.7% in a mean follow-up of 30 months (range 1 to 86 months). The incidence of perivalvular leak was 2.3% (4/171 operative survivors). Perivalvular leak was mild in two, and moderate in two; none required reoperation. Perivalvular leak developed only in patients whose suture line was not reinforced with glutaraldehyde treated pericardium. The continuous suture technique is a quick and effective method for AVR and results in a low incidence of perivalvular leak.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laks et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: