Why the study?
Biofeedback is gaining attention for helping athletes regulate their psychological state, but its application and effectiveness needed validation in racket sports players.
Does HRV biofeedback training improve HRV parameters in elite racket sports players?
Does HRV biofeedback training improve HRV parameters in elite racket sports players?
A 10-session HRV biofeedback training program significantly altered HRV parameters and respiratory rate in elite racket sports players, suggesting potential utility for psychophysiological regulation.
HRV biofeedback may aid psychological regulation in elite racket athletes; leaves open efficacy without controlled trials.
A biofeedback program receives attention as an intervention program for athletes to regulate their psychological state. Objectives. The purpose was to apply for a heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback training program and validate its effectiveness for racket sports players. Objectives. The purpose was to apply a heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback training program and validate its effectiveness for racket sports players. Methods. he participants were eight elite sport athletes (three men and five women): five squash players and three tennis players. The HRV biofeedback training program consisted of ten sessions in which the participants performed paced breathing for 10 minutes (e.g., 5-second inspiration and 5-second expiration). The means and standard deviations of the collected data were calculated, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed using SPSS windows 18.0. Results. Changes in HRV by the biofeedback training were significant. Standard Deviation of Normal to Normal (SDNN; Z = -2.38, p = 0.017) in time domain and Low Frequency (LF, Z = -2.52, p = 0.12) and the ratio of LF to High Frequency (HF; Z = -2.52, p = 0.12) in frequency domain were increased. Conclusion. The present study provides empirical results needed to expand HRV biofeedback training research for the performance enhancement program of athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: