Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability of corneal first-surface aberrations and aberrometric measurements of a combined aberrometer-topographer (iTrace Visual Function Analyzer) for 5 accommodative stimuli. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Eyes of young adults with low to moderate myopia or hyperopia were examined in 2 measurement series comprising 3 corneal topography measurements and wavefront measurements focusing on targets at 5 distances (0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 1.0, and 4.0 m). Repeatability was analyzed using the standard deviation (SD) within 6 measurements and the coefficient of repeatability (CoR) by Bland-Altman analysis of the means of the 2 measurement series. RESULTS: Fifty eyes (50 subjects) were evaluated. The lowest calculated mean SD/CoR measurements using the aberrometer function at 5 target distances were 0.07 μm/0.14 μm for total ocular aberrations root mean square (RMS), 0.07 μm/0.16 μm for lower-order aberrations (LOAs) RMS, 0.03 μm/0.66 μm for higher-order aberrations (HOAs) RMS, 0.10 diopter (D)/0.22 D for sphere, 0.08 D/0.13 D for cylinder, and 0.09 D/0.21 D for the spherical equivalent (SE). Repeatability of the total RMS, LOAs RMS, sphere, and SE measurements improved with increasing target distance (P < .01 for aberrometric values; P < .03 for refractive values). Measurement reproducibility using the corneal topographer showed mean SDs/CoRs of 0.19 μm/0.41 μm for total RMS, 0.19 μm/0.39 μm for LOAs RMS, and 0.08 μm/0.23 μm for HOAs RMS. CONCLUSION: The aberrometer showed satisfactory results for measurement repeatability at all target distances and declining repeatability with increasing accommodation effort. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gabriel et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: