Why the study?
Abnormal periods frequently arise in radial artery pulse wave segments due to external interference, segmentation method imperfections, and signal quality, creating a need to detect abnormal periods in real clinical data.
A simple logistic regression model using four features can accurately detect abnormal periods in radial artery pulse waves, with potential applications in wearable health devices.
May aid detection of abnormal radial pulse periods; leaves open rigorous validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND The radial artery pulse wave is a widely used physiological signal for disease diagnosis and personal health monitoring because it provides insight into the overall health of the heart and blood vessels. Periodic radial artery pulse signals are subsequently decomposed into single pulse wave periods (segments) for physiological parameter evaluations. However, abnormal periods frequently arise due to external interference, the inherent imperfections of current segmentation methods, and the quality of the pulse wave signals. OBJECTIVE The objective of this paper was to develop a machine learning model to detect abnormal pulse periods in real clinical data. METHODS Various machine learning models, such as k-nearest neighbor, logistic regression, and support vector machines, were applied to classify the normal and abnormal periods in 8561 segments extracted from the radial pulse waves of 390 outpatients. The recursive feature elimination method was used to simplify the classifier. RESULTS It was found that a logistic regression model with only four input features can achieve a satisfactory result. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from the test set was 0.9920. In addition, these classifiers can be easily interpreted. CONCLUSIONS We expect that this model can be applied in smart sport watches and watchbands to accurately evaluate human health status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: