Why the study?
Do angiotensin receptor blockers provide vascular benefits and improve clinical outcomes in cardiovascular patients?
Do angiotensin receptor blockers provide vascular benefits and improve clinical outcomes in cardiovascular patients?
This review highlights the potential of ARBs to inhibit atherosclerosis while noting contradictory clinical outcomes regarding myocardial infarction and in-stent restenosis, alongside solid evidence for cerebroprotection.
There is convincing evidence that angiotensin II, through activation of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor, is involved in the atherosclerotic process. Similarly, angiotensin receptor blockers decrease vascular inflammation, hypertrophy and thrombosis, which are the key components of the progression of atherosclerosis. In addition, in several animal models, angiotensin receptor blockade was able to inhibit atherosclerosis. However, the effects of angiotensin receptor blockers on clinical outcome in cardiovascular patients remains to be established. Contradictory results have been found on the reduction of the risk on myocardial infarctions and in-stent restenosis, although there is solid evidence for cerebroprotective effects of these receptor blockers. These differences may be related to the role of the AT2 receptor. This review discusses the role of angiotensin II and angiotensin receptor blockers in the atherosclerotic process and its translation into clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adriaan A. Voors (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: