Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tackling gender-based violence and harassment (GBVH) has become an increasingly urgent task for higher-education institutions (HEIs) globally. This article explores why HEIs take different approaches in the implementation of policies tackling GBVH. Through a comparative case-example approach that explores two contrasting HEIs in England, it focuses on an aspect of policy implementation that has been a particular challenge: formal report handling. One HEI in the example had implemented national legal guidance in this area; the other had not. Their work in this area was not primarily driven by the national guidance in either case; instead, a proactive response in one HEI was shaped by a “watershed case” of sexual violence. This article problematises analyses that homogenise the higher-education sector as taking a uniform approach to this issue, revealing a more complicated reality in which institutional actors are highly aware of problems with institutional processes and in which cultures around GBVH shape policy implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anna Bull (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: