Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The crystal structures of trimesic acid monohydrate 2 picric acid [TMA. H20.~-PA, triclinic, a = 18.269 (8), b = 8.852 (5), e = 3.642 (4) A, a = 90.43 (8), fl = 92.59 (6), y = 99.56 (5) °, P | , Z = 2] and trimesic acid hydrate [TMA.SH20, triclinic, a = 16.640 (1), b = 18.548 (1), e = 9.512 (1) A, a = 95.81 (1), fl = 91.06 (4), y = 94.35 (1) °, P1, Z = 12] were determined by standard four-circle diffractomcter techniques (Mo Ka', 2840 and 6768 non-zero reflections respectively). In TMA. H20.~PA there are hydrogen-bonded layers of-composition TMA .H20 in the (i i 1) planes; these layers are pierced by channels along [001] containing the picric acid molecules. Diffuse X-ray scattering by these crystals suggests that the enclathrated pictic acid molecules have only a short-range coherence with the TMA .HzO layers. TMA.5H2 O contains very similar layers of TMA. HzO in the (100) planes; the five such layers in the [I00] repeat are offset such that the channel takes on a zigzag shape in order to accommodate zigzag ribbons of TMA molecules (two per cell), hydrogen bonded through the carboxyl groups in the 1and 3-positions. The enclathrated TMA molecules are strictly ordered with respect to the TMA. H20 framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herbstein et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: