A structural study on two dopamine-based imide derivatives, namely, 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenethyl)isoindole-1,3-dione ( 1 ) and 2,6-bis-[2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)ethyl]pyrrolo [3,4-f]isoindole-1,3,5,7-tetrone ( 2 ), and their solvates was carried out. The compound 1 (Z′ = 2) was crystallized through a melt crystallization process, whereas its two solvates (Z′ = 1 of each), containing one water molecule ( 1a ) and the other containing two quinoline molecules ( 1b ) in their crystal lattices, respectively, were obtained through solution crystallization. The reasons for Z′ = 2 arising from symmetry nonequivalent molecules in the unit cell of 1 is attributed to the nonparallel arrangement of two layers of self-assembled molecules in crystal lattice, where one layer has C−H···π and another layer has C═O···π interactions. Four different solvates of compound 2 (Z′ = 0.5 of each), containing two DMF molecules ( 2a ), two DMSO molecules ( 2b ), two pyridine molecules ( 2c ), and six quinoline molecules ( 2d ), were also obtained through solution crystallization of 2 in respective solvents. Solvate 2d has channels in its structure which are formed by interaction of 2 with quinoline molecules through O−H···N and C−H···π interactions. Additional quinoline molecules reside in these channels of approximately (11 × 12) Å dimension. Structural features of all the compounds and their solvates have been studied by single crystal X-ray structures, powder X-ray diffractions (PXRD), thermogravimetric analyses (TGA), and differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: