Why the study?
Perioperative fluid management is critical in ERAS protocols, and the study aimed to determine whether epidural analgesia affects intraoperative fluid replacement and postoperative recovery during major abdominal surgery.
Does epidural analgesia reduce intraoperative fluid replacement and improve postoperative recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery with goal-directed fluid therapy?
Does epidural analgesia reduce intraoperative fluid replacement and improve postoperative recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery with goal-directed fluid therapy?
Epidural analgesia does not offer an advantage over intravenous analgesia regarding targeted fluid therapy or postoperative recovery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, but it is associated with significant intraoperative hypothermia.
Epidural analgesia shows no fluid or hemodynamic advantage over IV analgesia; leaves open its net ERAS value in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Objective: One of the most critical parameters of the ERAS protocol is perioperative fluid management.Goal-directed fluid therapy has advantages in this respect.We aimed to observe whether the epidural analgesia has an effect on intraoperative fluid replacement and postoperative recovery in patients who underwent major abdominal surgery in this study.Methods: Forty-six patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colon surgery under general anesthesia, aged 18-75, ASA I-III, were included in the study.The patients were divided into two groups as those who received epidural analgesia and those who did not receive epidural analgesia (intravenous, IV analgesia group).Goal-directed fluid therapy was arranged with Pleth Variability Index (PVI) monitoring in both groups.Results: There was no difference in the amount of the fluid administered and the hemodynamic parameters between the groups.Intraoperative PVI trend significantly decreased in the epidural group while it was stable in the IV analgesia group.(p=0.03).Body temperature was significantly lower at the end of the surgery compared to the beginning of the epidural analgesia group (p<0.001).But no significant change n body temperature was observed in the IV analgesi group (p=0.182).There was no difference between groups in terms of hospital length of stay, postoperative complications, and clinical recovery time. Conclusion:The administration of epidural analgesia does not have an advantage in comparison to the IV analgesia group in terms of targeted fluid therapy and the postoperative process and recovery time in laparoscopic colorectal surgery performed under general anesthesia.More detailed evaluations are needed for the effectiveness of PVI in intraoperative fluid therapy optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DOĞANÖZÜ et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: