Key result
Goal-directed therapy with esophageal Doppler monitoring decreased post-operative complications and ICU admissions compared to standard fluid management in four out of five analyzed trials.
Why the study?
Does goal-directed therapy with esophageal Doppler monitoring reduce post-operative complications and length of stay in adults undergoing colo-rectal and abdominal surgery compared to standard weight-based fluid therapy?
Systematic Review
Does goal-directed therapy with esophageal Doppler monitoring reduce post-operative complications and length of stay in adults undergoing colo-rectal and abdominal surgery compared to standard weight-based fluid therapy?
Goal-directed intra-operative fluid therapy using esophageal Doppler monitoring may decrease post-operative complications and ICU admissions in abdominal surgery compared to standard weight-based therapy.
Supports esophageal Doppler goal-directed therapy in abdominal surgery; extends Level 1 evidence for fewer complications versus standard care.
Intravenous fluid management in the peri-operative period continues to be a debate in the anesthesia literature in terms of which fluid type is best along with how much fluid should be given. The majority of post-operative complications in colo-rectal surgery can be traced back to the amount of IV fluids patients receive. Most recently the term Goal- directed therapy (GDT) states that a more individualized approach to fluid management is not only safer but necessary. The Esophageal Doppler, a technology analyzing stroke volume and cardiac output intra-operative, may prove to be a safe way to provide GDT and decrease complications post-operatively. This systematic review examined the impact of the esophageal Doppler versus the traditional weight based fluid management technique on adult (>18 years of age) patient outcomes post-operatively after colo-rectal and abdominal surgery. The goal was to highlight best practices that will decrease adverse patient events and length of stay (LOS). Four out of the five randomized controlled trials analyzed for this review do report that ED use and GDT decrease complications and ICU admissions post-operatively versus utilizing a more standard approach to fluid management. Due to other social variables in discharging subjects, length of stay was not found to be decreased in GDT subject groups. In furthering anesthesia practice, standard fluid management techniques should be updated with a more individualized approach focusing on patient variables such as stroke volume and what the response is to fluid therapy intra-operatively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amanda Krueger (2016) conducted a systematic review in Colo-rectal and abdominal surgery. Goal-directed therapy with Esophageal Doppler monitoring vs. Traditional weight based fluid management technique was evaluated on Post-operative complications, ICU admissions, and length of stay. Goal-directed therapy with esophageal Doppler monitoring decreased post-operative complications and ICU admissions compared to standard fluid management in four out of five analyzed trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: