Why the study?
Previous data on racial disparities in myocardial infarction outcomes have been inconsistent and limited to older populations, despite Black patients developing coronary artery disease at a younger age.
Does Black race increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in young or middle-aged patients after a myocardial infarction?
Does Black race increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in young or middle-aged patients after a myocardial infarction?
In young and middle-aged survivors of a myocardial infarction, Black patients have a 2-fold higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, which is largely explained by socioeconomic disparities rather than clinical or psychological factors.
Black patients face 2-fold higher post-MI event risk; leaves open whether unmeasured factors drive disparities in young adults.
Background Black patients tend to develop coronary artery disease at a younger age than other groups. Previous data on racial disparities in outcomes of myocardial infarction (MI) have been inconsistent and limited to older populations. Our objective was to investigate racial differences in the outcome of MI among young and middle-aged patients and the role played by socioeconomic, psychosocial, and clinical differences. Methods and Results We studied 313 participants (65% non-Hispanic Black) <61 years old hospitalized for confirmed type 1 MI at Emory-affiliated hospitals and followed them for 5 years. We used Cox proportional-hazard models to estimate the association of race with a composite end point of recurrent MI, stroke, heart failure, or cardiovascular death after adjusting for demographic, socioeceonomic status, psychological, and clinical risk factors. The mean age was 50 years, and 50% were women. Compared with non-Black patients, Black patients had lower socioeconomic status and more clinical and psychosocial risk factors but less angiographic coronary artery disease. The 5-year incidence of cardiovascular events was higher in Black (35%) compared to non-Black patients (19%): hazard ratio (HR) 2.1, 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.6. Adjustment for socioeconomic status weakened the association (HR 1.3, 95% CI, 0.8-2.4) more than adjustment for clinical and psychological risk factors. A lower income explained 46% of the race-related disparity in outcome. Conclusions Among young and middle-aged adult survivors of an MI, Black patients have a 2-fold higher risk of adverse outcomes, which is largely driven by upstream socioeconomic factors rather than downstream psychological and clinical risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
García et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: