Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ship maneuverability models are typically defined by three degrees of freedom: surge, sway, and yaw. However, patrol vessels operating in riverine environments often exhibit significant roll motion during course changes, necessitating the inclusion of this dynamic. This study develops interpretable machine learning models capable of predicting vessel behavior in four degrees of freedom (4-DoF): surge, sway, yaw, and roll. A dataset of 125 h of simulated maneuvers was employed, including 29 h of out-of-distribution (OOD) conditions to test model generalization. Four models were implemented and compared over a 15-step prediction horizon: linear regression, third-order polynomial regression, a state-space model obtained via the N4SID algorithm, and an AutoRegressive model with eXogenous inputs (ARX). Results demonstrate that all models captured the essential vessel dynamics, with the state-space model achieving the best overall performance (e.g., NMSE = 0.0246 for surge velocity on test data and 0.0499 under OOD conditions). Variable-wise, surge and sway showed the lowest errors, roll rate remained stable, and yaw rate was the most sensitive to distribution shifts. Model-wise, the ARX model achieved the lowest NMSE for surge prediction (0.0149), while regression-based models provided interpretable yet less accurate alternatives. Multi-horizon evaluation (1-, 5-, 15-, and 30-step) under OOD conditions confirmed a consistent monotonic degradation across models. These findings validate the feasibility of using interpretable machine learning models for predictive control, autonomous navigation, and combat scenario simulation in riverine operations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Contreras et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: