Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Interactions of a normal shock with a turbulent boundary layer over a flat surface were investigated with and without imposing mass removal. The approach flow was very nearly two-dimensional, with a uniform freestream Mach number of 1.48, strong enough to cause separation at the shock foot. Suction was imposed immediately upstream of the shock over a finely perforated surface, removing much of the boundary-layer flow. The time-mean wall pressure distributions and two components of the time-mean velocity vector field were determined for both cases. Mass removal distorted the original shock pattern and eliminated the separation at the shock foot while reducing the boundary-layer thicknesses and growth rates to less than half. Mass removal also introduced some undesirable effects: asymmetric sidewall boundary-layer growth in the subsonic flow and increased shock oscillation amplitudes. The removed mass flow varied strongly in the streamwise direction in a manner that indicated wide variations of the flow coefficients for the individual perforations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morris et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: