Why the study?
Evidence for pharmacologic fracture efficacy is established primarily in postmenopausal women, whereas evidence remains scarce for the oldest old men and women.
Do pharmacologic interventions reduce fracture risk in patients 85 years or older?
Do pharmacologic interventions reduce fracture risk in patients 85 years or older?
Pharmacologic interventions for fracture risk reduction appear efficacious in patients 85 years or older, though evidence is limited by small sample sizes.
Evidence gaps limit fracture prevention guidance for adults ≥85 years; leaves open need for frailty-focused trials.
With an increasingly older population, the proportion of patients 85 years or older seeking interventions to protect their musculoskeletal health is growing. Osteoporosis in the geriatric population presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Multimorbidity, frailty, falls, polypharmacy, and other neurobehavioral factors influence our approach to fracture prevention in this population. The vast majority of the evidence from clinical trials establish pharmacologic fracture efficacy in postmenopausal women. The evidence is scarce for the oldest old men and women, a population also at risk for adverse events and mortality. Most studies show continued efficacy of pharmacologic interventions in this age group, although they are largely limited by small sample sizes. We herein review the available evidence of pharmacologic interventions for fracture risk reduction in this population and explore the emerging senotherapeutic interventions in the pipeline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sfeir et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: